Mission Impossible. Movie Review

  Mission Impossible ...  Movie Review.

Release Date. 1/04/2022.

Language:   Telugu

Casting .. Taapsee Pannu, Harsh Roshan, Bhanu Prakshan, Jayateertha Molugu & Others

Music Director: Mark K Robin, 

Cinematography : Deepak Yeragara,

Editor: Raviteja Girijala,

Producers: Niranjan Reddy & Anvesh Reddy,

Director: Swaroop RSJ

          Let's not have the confidence gained with Agent‌.`, let's not bring Tapsi into his team .. Let's not have three children like Paramanandayya's disciples appear in the poster .. That title .. Like all this .. This movie will increase the interest. And more. Did Swarup hit the ground running in his second mission? What exactly is this mission for ..?

          Shailu (Tapsi) is an investigative journalist. Conducts research on child trafficking. Ram Shetty is a mafia don. He sketches to move a large number of children from Bangalore to Dubai. It is to prevent it anyway and arrest Ram Shetty as a red handed to the police. Style Mission‌. On the other hand .. Raghupati, Raghava and Rajaram have three friends in a small village near Tirupati. They are only 11 years old. However. Their hope is to become the most famous person in town. They want to raise crores of rupees for that. If Dawood Ibrahim is caught. Seeing the news on TV that a prize of Rs 50 lakh will be given. They leave Mumbai unannounced to catch Dawood. The name given to the mission is "Mission Impossible". However .. the style that was seen to prevent child trafficking in Bangalore .. went to Mumbai and caught Dawood. Seeing the Rs 50 lakh freeze money hit .. Where did the link to Raghupati Raghava Rajaram come from? Both of these missions. How did they become one? Did they succeed in that, or not? Is the rest of the story.

            Shailu. The story begins with the mission. O Dan with a seventeen year old child. Killing scene it is. In fact .. this is where Hintu finds that the director has decided to leave the logic and do the magic. To kill a mole .. give a gun to a child's hand? Wadi should be the future? The question is. It is ironic that he does not fit into the style of an investigative journalist. If it comes .. it will be covered with some kind of elusive logic. After that .. the story of RRR (Raghupati, Raghava, Rajaram) begins. The introduction of these three children, their friendship, the mischief, the sketches made to catch Dawood go on a lot of fun. Swaroop got good marks here as a writer. He has enough humor in him. It looked great in these scenes. Rajamouli, Sukumar, Trivikram, Puri quoting movies .. sketching .. the fun born in it .. give time pass. Feeling Mumbai and landing in Bangalore. Exactly then. The style also takes an interval card as it lands in Bangalore.

            The first part ended in an hour. Children's fun, Interval twist ‌ .. In between these logical ‌ .. Sorry about the story. However in the second half that opportunity was not given. The plight of these three children, the dawn affairs, the child trafficking are all boring. Does the style play the role of an investigative journalist? Otherwise. CB CIDina .. seems to be all over. If she gives orders .. it feels ridiculous for a police officer to follow them. In the middle is another `Mahanadi` type scene. This is a popular scene in `Mahanadi` even when the original scene is being shot. Can't the director remember that? Haven't seen the original movie?

          What is the style of heroism in trying to thwart three children and accomplish a dangerous mission? Besides .. are they all intelligent children? Bombayki, Mumbaiki, Mumbaiki Bangalore The real difference is ignorant ignoramuses. In fact the other ones are very fast. Folklore has been abuzz for ten years. Yet. Why show them as paranoid disciples? That is to say .. in some scenes he saw them as very intelligent people .. in other places .. he turned them into grandparents. He wrote the scenes as he wished. Although he enjoyed the children's mischief in the first half and forgave the mistake .. the director did it without that opportunity in the second half.

           Tapsi is choosing a new kind of story. Something while telling the story .. may seem new. That is why his character is admittedly short in length. Tapsi did not do this. Anyone in that role is okay. The highlight is the performance of the three children. Surely they can enjoy their screen presence. Innocence in their face, very intelligent well-grown. The rest of the screen time is very short.

           Technically .. the movie feels okay. Spend as much as you need for the story. Three children. The concept of going on a mission with an unknown self and achieving something else is great. But. Hence there is no strength in the chosen background. No logics. Comedy in some places .. saved. The dialogues are funny here and there. Beyond that .. there is nothing remarkable about this mission.

Finishing Touch: Its‌ .. Impossible‌.